My only condition would be that points need to short, clear and to the point.
So, to sum up your statement and keep it short - What your saying is and this is based on what we know of the Bible, you only want half truths.
An example of that, as you have pretty much shown in the past, with the Thomas matter.
And the vital half truth you seemed to want excluded then was - The Key of why Thomas said what he did.
Thomas was told earlier (facts) that the Almighty God and Father dwelt IN Jesus.
Vital and necessary part needed, considering what Thomas said, even though, the Key point he was acknowledging, was the fact that Jesus was alive.
The reason I said that where necessary, we needed to rely on the Greek, was because, there is "clear" evidence in places, where someone has translated the Greek and supposedly placed the English equivalent word, from "which" our translations are based on, that this English "word" is NOT even an option to chose from.
The staggering part of this is, no one want to know about it?
And one example is - Where we see the likes of, "By" Jesus the worlds were made = "By" from the Greek is NOT an option.
Why, how could that happen - It would "appear" trinity mindset when translating OR, ignoring numerous OT (half truths) verses.
But yes, I understand and accept, that you don't want to play haha.
But at the same time, at least you at times, give your reasons why you think this and that, and don't just brush off what someone else says, or your have a GO, at countering and admit, if you don't have the answer.
