Sounds perfectly reasonable to me Ocker.
Its certainly worth a shot.
I think the "pro-cvi posters" welcome any contructive opposing views, provided they are well backed with some decent reasoning etc. On the same note, baseless up ramps etc should not be tolerated.
Lets hope that with this zero tolerance approach, we end up with those having serious views on the stock to discuss it in a civil way.
Those just wanting to "shat stirr" need not apply.
cheers.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CVI
- cant see the forest for the trees
cant see the forest for the trees, page-53
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 15 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)