Are you seriously trying to say that only one party in a negotiation has the right to be part of that negotiation? ...or are you making the even more fallacious argument that somehow only one party in a negotiation has the right to accept or reject the proposal that is the subject of the negotiation?
View attachment 1098883
The problem with this ridiculous argument is that it takes two to tango and it takes at least two to reach an agreement.
If anyone believes this sort of spurious point of view or line of thought then more fool them.
So to make it clear, if we replace "negotiate", with attempt to reach an agreement", then Anglo have the right to attempt to reach an agreement.
Something any entity has I would have thought. Just a feel-good but ultimately meaningless statement included in a previous MOU (by previous management) just to make the parties "feel good" about the discussion.
Anything to try to nudge the SP in a negative direction I guess.
I think it's time we all agreed that the JV line of thought is futile, it was only ever an MOU or an agreement to try to do a deal in the future.
I definitely do not want a joint-venture with any company until production has been proven and targets explored thoroughly, so I'm very happy with our current status in that regard.
There is a great deal of good news that has "gone through to the keeper" because the market wants to see real GOLD production -not unreasonable after the delays we have had. What it does mean is that we will be set up for a slingshot effect after gold production is confirmed, as the good news (that Salt has referred to today) is also then reflected in the share-price.
I've been doing some further research and will share it in good time, but at the moment positive fundamentals will be of most benefit to traders, so I will keep it to myself at the moment. Just cant think why I should help those who are not only short term traders, but sometimes rude and insulting to those have spent hours providing their research free of charge. Not to mention those who provide an heroic defence on behalf of a new poster when they can't see the true pattern in the posting style that has emerged. In their defence, you may not see the pattern emerge if you only watch the forum occasionally ...or perhaps the concept was just too abstruse.
The way I feel at the moment is that OGX needs to do more to ensure production is being ramped up and that more regular news of this is communicated on time. Otherwise negative sentiment will prevail on HC, regardless of fundamentals.
It's been good personally to have a break from posting as I have focused on my health (through fasting actually ...welcome to msg for info). Others including flip-flopers can argue up or down as they want and I'll be back with more fundamental info after the company provides the foundation of production news to stand on.
Cheers,
SJB
