deal of the century but how real is it, page-30

When Blood sold it was sour grapes. He saw a sp that was peaking and sold out because a) he had no vision for the future of IMI, b) he did not like Bonvino and probably felt emasculated by him and c) he kner that his selling would be interpreted as a bad sign and so it suited him to sell (revenge?).

On the other hand he might just have needed the money and did not feel confident leaving it in IMI!

Either way its ancient history - can we move on?

BTW, regardless of the type of target customer, IMI is in an expanding health fitness group and if you understand Cardanal you would know that the ongoing benefits of using it are: a) knowing where you are today, b) after a period of exercise (weeks and/or months), you would know how your heart fitness had changed, i.e. better or worse and c) given your current heart state, the fitness centre could tailor your exercise regime to improve your heart condition. Any of the above would ensure an ongoing income stream for IMI - its not just a once of.

So why the fuss? Why does every IMI announcement, positive of otherwise, always seem to attract dissenters? Only one reason comes to mind - self interest. If you don't have any IMI, you want some, at a lower sp. If you have some you want more, at a lower sp. If you have enough you want the price to go up. In this environment no poster has any cred.

Therefore forget the innuendo and stick to facts - or at least intelligent speculation!