Ex agree in principle. As for my part only did 1 post of any substance there. I have always welcomed contrarian views and they have saved my butt on at least 3 occassions on unrelated stocks.
I have NEVER posted a negative post on a thread I was not vested in.
Bruutz's manic attacks on NUH sparked a quick analysis of that analysis.
Holders there can make there own decisions. Unlike this board where we tend to analyse every micro movement and tend to self censor rampy posts...I didn't see that at all over there. So in this specific case I feel that "opening" up the eyes of holders there isn't negative. I could well be wrong and the Co ends up successful. But if our provoked intervention over there makes holders look harder at their holding then I can't see we harmed a thing. Most of the posts were on this board anyway!
In any event for my part it is not something I intend to repeat.
Interestingly though for me it puts to rest that often stated principle that HC can't influence SP...seems it truly can.
Remind you Bruutz spruiked it on the STT thread...doubt he'll be stealing a guernsey any time soon.
Leave it at that for my part...and agree what you've posted in general...but feel on this occassion it was justified not just because of B's abhorrent behaviour but think they needed a little reality check over there as well.
NUH Price at posting:
9.9¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
(20min delay)