It looks pretty clear to me that the revised agreement does not stipulate forced JV of any of the tenements to Bhushan.
Merely right of refusal, and the ownership rights and obligations should they choose to exercise.
Yet there is obviously an intention to JV at least one of them or there would be no agreement.
See a small snip of the agreement below and tell be what you think.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
52.0¢ |
Change
0.005(0.97%) |
Mkt cap ! $143.1M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 52.0¢ | 52.0¢ | 51.5¢ | $179.8K | 346.0K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 98900 | 52.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 53.0¢ | 2500 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.14pm 18/07/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| BWN (ASX) Chart |