Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

CGB

Click for more information

0.00%

2.1¢ cann global limited

Ann: Suspension Extension Request, page-205

First 205 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Hotcopperkem

190 Posts.

1

21/05/18

07:50

Post #: 33222376
Share

Originally posted by Hanno ↑

Sorry mate, but this makes no sense to me. QBL currently have a controlling interest in MCL (>50%). As a majority shareholder, they would ultimately have the say on whether the bid would be supported. If a bid were to be made, and don’t forget this is QBL’s shares we are talking about - not MCL - the owners of QBL’s shares would already have factored into their minds the future value of an income stream from MCL, Bauxite or both, making an offer price more expensive. I have also seen comments about a reverse takeover being of a shell mining company, presumably at a small cost, since that company has no assets as such. QBL is not a shell company: it potentially has significant assets of an undetermined value in MCL and also, who knows, in bauxite.
‘Everyone would sell QBL to buy MCL’, fine - but if QBL already control 55% of MCL, the most anybody else could buy into MCL would be 45%, still leaving control with QBL.

Expand

What is to stop QBL to sell or transfere it's 55% share to whom ever

QBL Price at posting: 4.9¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
1 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

IVZ

Invictus banks US$5M from Zimbabwean investment fund in support of Cabora Bassa

PAM

PAM secures high-grade Chilean copper play in strong territory

BIO

Biome unveils three year revenue target up to $85M – but are 3Y targets enough to excite?

BOE

$550 million Jabiluka uranium offer comes unstuck as Government rules lease won't be renewed

AZL

Brine and shine: Arizona Lithium wins early stage eco approval to commence wellpad #2 at Prairie

There are more pages in this discussion • 67 more messages in this thread...

First 205 Last

Add CGB (ASX) to my watchlist