"so all abused do not become abusers. Some do. A lot of abusers were abused themselves."
Thats only because theirs a lot of abuse about,....Lets get this crystal clear, statistacally, from Peer reviewed Journal artices, (the highest form of knowledge, our society possesses), studies have shown there is (if anything, (there is always room for some doubt) a lower chance of someone who has been abused, becomming an abuser. There certainly, NO VALIDITY, on current, best knowledge, and NO EVIDENCE, to support the argument, that the abused are MORE likely than the general public to become abusers. Simply, no evidence whatso ever. Therefore, if there are alot of abusers, who were abused, its is BECAUSE, there is a lot of abuse in the wider general population.
I can't be any clearer than that.
I accept your argument re: court case mitigation. I never said the Court system can't be played like a game. It never the less goes nowhere, in support of your continued propogation of this myth. I have explained the damage it causes, yet, you persist. DO YOU WANT ME TO POST THE JOURNAL REFERENCES FOR YOU !!!!
I wonder why, it is so hard to understand that, anyone who has been through hell and back, is probably LESS likely to subject someone else to the same experience. Its kind of a warped indictment of how you view the general level of morality in society, if you believe the alternative. From, my point of view, it makes absolute perfect sense.
