Keleen, your comment kicking off this thread -- a statement "as fact" that the deal was done was unwise. It could certainly be considered market manipulation. I invite you down from your pedestal, just a little.
The tally you refer to was received under false pretences. That's the one where you said you would provide some statistics at the end of the week. While it can be well understood why little information was shared, that was not the promise made. Perhaps you put a nose or two out of joint by treating others like mushrooms. It can be very possible to largely do a fantastic job for the community while irritating with poor implementation of some details. A little blow-back should be expected.
My value invested is significant for me but not sufficient to support legal avenues. If the value had been 5x higher I might have considered a takeover panel action forcing a restart of the process with the missing independent expert report. Such action is direct, it doesn't rely on ASIC's cooperation. Those avenues in parallel with work seeking other offers.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AVB
- Ann: Change in substantial holding from OZL
Ann: Change in substantial holding from OZL, page-62
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 77 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AVB (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online