looks to me like bill has an agenda too. hope the mods are watching closely....
and as far as directors buying, they couldnt have explained the situation more clearly to shareholders, they said they believed the intrinsic value of the company was much higher and would buy and continue to buy until they had reached their target holding. they released dozens of change of directors interest notices over the last year, if people chose to ignore them too bad. No one could argue that their buying was only because of the alcoholics results (which they had made clear were excellent results but waiting on patents). no problem here, just a few people who probably decided that SLA was a dud years ago, bitter and disappointed that it has been one of the best performing biotechs on the ASX in the last year.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SLA
- the alcholics trial
the alcholics trial, page-59
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 34 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)