The value in Atlas is that is has tax losses because it has a terrible core business, and it has the right - that it may have already lost - to build a port that it can never afford.
So in short a standalone Atlas is either dead or close to it.
It only has more substantial value if it is taken over.
The idea that another management team can turn around a high cost business for an product that appears to be in structural decline is far-fetched.
Brutal as it may be, Atlas is worth much more dead than alive.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AGO
- Ann: Becoming a substantial holder
Ann: Becoming a substantial holder, page-145
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 115 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AGO (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online