So much for " Cheap Green " SA Power, page-191

  1. 11,078 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 315
    made the time to look more closely at the ANU study, and you are correct re the 41% wind capacity factor, so I had a bit of a look into that below
    but noting also they appear to have been pretty conservative on renewables prices, just using current prices, rather than anticipating expected further price reductions.

    on the 41% wind capacity factor: a quick look around spotted these articles

    https://reneweconomy.com.au/new-australian-wind-farms-reach-nearly-50-capacity-factor-99179/
    that speaks for itself, but over a relatively short three month period, for two small farms totally 51MW

    https://reneweconomy.com.au/australias-biggest-wind-farm-is-also-its-least-productive-88611/
    was expected to produce 35%, but performing at more like 26% (or less with recent shutdown period)
    but that's regarded as worst in Aus
    that compared to an average existing Vic State wind capacity factor average that looks low 30's to a bit higher
    the article talks also about
    Stockyard Hill 530MW expected to reach 45% capacity factor
    Hornsdale 309MW "in the 40's"
    Collgar 207MW "mid to high 40's"
    Silverton 450MW "expected around 44.5%"
    Coopers Gap 460MW "around 35%"
    and a table of existing SA wind farms averaging what looks to be like low 30's

    that SA average is confirmed here
    https://www.energycouncil.com.au/analysis/capacity-factors-understanding-the-misunderstood/
    which also indicates Tasmania wind capacity factor "reaching 37%"

    That first link puts those newer stations hitting 40's and near the 50's due to "the development of wind turbines, which are getting bigger and more able to generate power at lower wind speeds" (as well as the quoted company's own wind tech).

    So 41% going forward? May not be unreasonable?
    Last edited by mjp2: 28/06/18
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.