Sunrise...Financing the Mine, page-85

I agree as long as the facts are good, the intentions sincere, and the emotions are kept in check.

If we have a solid pick then we should be able to rebut the negatives; or failing in that, at least be able to see the contrary possibilities, and have a balanced and realistic view about them.

The issues brought up by Flippa about potential operational problems, Chinese partnerships, and
unproven status of the process at scale are good examples. There is no way to conclusively prove what the outcome will be about these issues. But that does not mean we should ignore the possibility of them having an adverse impact, or pretend like they do not exist. Nor does it mean we should be insulting to those who have a different assessment of them.

One poster followed me around and persisted in making silly negative posts. It was easy exercise
to rebut them, but after a while it is just tiresome and a nuisance, and the lack of good faith is unpleasant and toxic in large quantities.