"Not once have you ever given Robinson credit or supported his crusade to expose what he has been right about over and over again."
"It is painfully clear that it is because Robinson is exposing Muslims so instead of giving him credit for exposing child rape, you cheer on those that target Robinson."
His BS "crusade" is an establishment, elitist campaign deliberately begun by The Times (Murdoch gutter trash) and taken up by the entire mainstream media. Robinson is a tool of the ultra rich who want to whip up hatred against muslims to divert attention from the fact that the growing divide between rich and poor is getting worse and worse year after year.
He's a low rent criminal spiv trying to make a career for himself as a "victim of the establishment" while carrying out an establishment campaign based on a fraud.
Origins of the Asian Grooming Gang
On the 5th of January, 2011, The Times newspaper launched an exclusive four-page exposé on the “sexual exploitation of hundreds of young British girls by criminal pimping gangs”. The article claimed that “child protection experts” had identified a separate category of sex offending which The Times labelled “on-street grooming”, and that within this profile “most of the victims are white” and that “most of the convicted offenders are of Pakistani heritage”. The politically-conservative newspaper revealed that its own investigation even had the statistics to back these findings up.
Inevitably, within no time, the story had ignited national hysteria. Over the following days, all majornewsoutletscoveredthe story, as well as radio talk-back shows and websites. That same week, The Times doubled down heavily, with further front page ‘scoops’, opinion pieces, web-chats and letters to the editor all relating back to the initial investigation. From our counting, they ran at least twenty articles on the topic of ‘on-street grooming’ in the following seven days to accompany their initial exclusive.
Davies’ arm was being twisted by the combined forces of Rupert Murdoch and the British tabloid press to react, not to child sexual exploitation holistically, but to this new menace, whose crimes were uniquely Asian. Yet what makes this influence even more striking, and what went largely unnoticed, is that The Times’ original investigation was intrinsically flawed.
The investigation was heavily criticised by the very experts whose research The Times had cited, or “de-contextualised” in an attempt to add weight to their own report — sexual exploitation and human trafficking researchers at University College London, Dr Ella Cockbain and Helen Brayley. Within two days of the story breaking and their research cited within it, Cockbain and Brayley wrote to The Times, warning their readers to not “to be blinded by this emergent and untested racial stereotype”, which was crudely being exploited by The Times. Furthermore, additional criticisms of the investigation were:
17 cases over 14 years did not make up the “tidal wave” of offending that it stated was taking place.
The investigation failed to justify or explain how it came to decide on their criteria for selecting some cases and not others.
The criteria eventually chosen appeared biased towards Asian offenders. Almost like the author looked at where Asian offenders were most prevalent, and based his criteria on what their offending all had in common.
The investigation relied on taking the author/researcher at his word on his results, rather than showing any clear methodology or evidence of data gathering.
The author/researcher only included cases he could ‘identify’, whatever that means.
Dr Cockbain herself made the following remarks referring to The Times investigation:
“Findings from an exploratory academic study were cited in support, despite the authors publicly emphasising that their (unpublished) work, focusing on two cases alone, had been de-contextualised and deliberately ‘over-extended to characterise an entire crime type”
“ These inclusion parameters (of the Times Investigation) have never been explained or justified, despite the questionable decision to exclude male victims wholesale. This raises the question as to whether the statistical exercise was deliberately designed to isolate evidence for a predetermined ‘Asian model”
The whole "asian grooming gangs" lie is a fraud, and so is Robinson.
