If MMX is sueing its former directors that means CHM has a case against MMX. The former directors represented the company at that time - if they sign a dud deal on behalf of the company, the company has the right to sack them but still have to honor the deal. By sueing its own former directors, MMX exposed itself as a guilty party.
latest chm announcement, page-13
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 6 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add CHM (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.8¢ |
Change
-0.002(10.0%) |
Mkt cap ! $15.52M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 2.0¢ | 2.1¢ | 1.8¢ | $52.52K | 2.715M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | 1129118 | 1.8¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.9¢ | 280000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 24/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| CHM (ASX) Chart |