Observations & Current state of Play, page-17

Thanks mate I always try to keep things on a even keel with stocks -detractors don’t worry me they are just frustrated with a stale sp at present

Yeah you would think so on the new recruits mate I agree

As I said reputation is integral in the corporate world .

I doubt the ex CAT guy came cheap but reading up on him exactly the type of guy we want here.

You ever been to places like Soweto or Calcutta mate or the Sudan I have and it’s heart wrenching to see the poverty and squalid living conditions.

The potential of this machine to make social change is very real.Hence that’s why I think the govt interest OS as Mike has pointed out many times in interviews

Mike said it would be a no brainer for the UN to buy 100 of these machines.

I definitely sense here a big part of there target market is overseas governments looking for low cost building solutions -or have machines that could assist in disaster situations.

I’m pretty sure they would have been pitching this to the WA govt delegation that deal with overseas governments.

If you look at the time line to CAT maybe going binding I say maybe for a reason -it’s a ways to revenues isn’t it

If your spending 30 mill a year to expand the company going forward you have to make a lot of money to
Get into enough profit that holders can share thru a rising SP

I don’t think people realise that if CAT take the manufacturing up just what FBR will get out of it in the end

I have my own views on what FBR May end up with I’m sure some won’t fjnd them popular

Reality is in order for inventors to take something to the world they have to sell a lot of the farm

Which is fine if they are selling shed loads of machines

Better to get something of a big pie than nothing of the pie .

I think the Pivacs would have a fair idea of what they will need to give up with the IP to scale the machine.