With respect to those who are now voicing their concerns and objections re the reply, the Board posted in here tonight. Please be aware that the Board was genuine in its intent to help our shareholders in getting more details about the anns. In fairness, we did give the forum a chance to accept, or voice their opposition to having this be posted.
The role of a Company rep is to do exactly what our critics don't want us to do. That is. to answer and reply to questions in a forum like this. Companies have been invited by HC to send their reps to answer questions, clarify statements and announcements, and post information known to the market. Critics will always be there. My role has been to also read the mood of the room, and when necessary take a step back, if required, when things get out of hand. We have done that as well, of late.
The company stands by its comments. We are confident on the path we have set and will continue to make sure our shareholders get information into their hands that will help them understand what the company is doing during this transformation period.
Shareholders are invited to contact the Company directly about any concerns or questions they may have. We were very happy to post the reply tonight to help people understand a little more about the reason why we were restricted in answering questions on MCL over the past 11 months. For those who need to read the information, it has been posted for you to read and digest, with thanks from your Board.
