Actual figures? Why bother? If you could see two different futures for IFL (say over 3 years), would you prefer to invest in the one that will have a 10% annual rate of FUM accretion through enticing dealer groups, and 0% organic net flows, or the one that will have a 0% rate of accretion through dealer groups and 10% organic?
I'm obviously referring to the metric being not bad, not to the disclosure. Do you have trouble with context sometimes, or do you just like Socratic arguments?
IFL Price at posting:
$9.19 Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)