like to hear from any geos on this thread, page-34

the coal cross section that the geo talked about was a totaly different section and in a different area as apposed to what CDS is talking about , CDS coal cross section looks like the one from the waterberg area as shown in there news release , go back through this thread and there is a table to show you what CDS cross section looks like , sorry i dont know how to cut and past the table or i would , but the short of it is that the tables of coal seams were different

hope this is as clear as coal

regards

stured

go CDS GO