Point taken Epav. Maybe GSF want to make 100% sure the details are accurate before thy put their name to it instead of relying on second hand info. I did understand the first ann as based on older estimates and results by others which GSF want to confirm whilst undertaking their own "due diligence". Obviously GSF directors wanted to clarify this with their second ann to make sure there is no misunderstanding.
more announcements to come soon, page-10
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 11 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)