opus clients please read this urgent, page-137

  1. 360 Posts.
    jkelly thats my biggest concern and is the only real legal leg to stand on..No where does it say in their disclosure we sign over legal ownership of our shares to them!!Otherwise who in their right mind would?
    The two problems are:
    1.Afew top dogs given preferential treatment not to met their margin requirements.Not the the responsibility of the so called lending pool to cough up,its the responsibility of opes to receive the cash or close out their position,not go into receivership.Where does it say we'll be responsible for other peoples margin calls?Do you think it would've worked the opposite way if they were to have made massive profits,hey guys you helped pay our margin calls,now its time for everyone to share in our profits,I dont think so..

    2."Irregularities in cash and stock movement" constitutes illegal behaviour and therefore beyond anything associated with agreeing to their credit risk clause.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.