AN1 0.00% 0.8¢ anagenics limited

Ann: Preliminary Final Report, page-94

ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM
CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
  1. 1,453 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 141
    Crafty post of yours Ooogerbooger to create false premises, misrepresent the clear intention of my post and put words in my mouth for your own purpose, whatever that is. It demonstrates lack of comprehension and reason. Or were you simply being mischievous?

    Your opening criticism could more aptly be applied to your own post rather than mine. Where you were heading with the rest of your post is unclear, however, in part it served to endorse my views that a rational, impartial investor’s level of agreement with management stewardship would preferably ebb and flow over time.

    You falsely accuse me that I’d “ accuse the Board of lining their own pockets” and called other posters “one-eyed disciples of the CEO..” yet they are entirely your own “emotive descriptors” (your term also). I’ve never used “one-eyed” or “lining their own pockets”. With due respect, that seems crafty, tacky and disingenuous of you Ooogerbooger.

    You’ve attempted to weave in to decry my criticism of the terms of the capital raising, as other posters also had criticised, on which I’d stated my position weeks ago. And you curiously demand with another of your ‘emotive descriptors’ “So, put your money where your mouth is -” I continue to have a significant stake in CDY, fully participated in the CR and have all our best interests at heart.

    The majority here would presumably prefer posts that are reasoned and objective (Unbiased, equitableness, even handed and impartial) and that posters fluctuate up and down over time with their degree of support for management; “the Intelliger Investor”. As opposed to continuous blind faith.

    An unbiased, reasoned reading of my previous post would properly see it as support and appreciation for T7 (and Lev) justifiably revered here, yet also implored their expertise be applied more balanced where warranted on the ebs and flows of management decisions, directions and outcomes. You failed to see that would be in everyone’s best interest.

    The reason behind your post is unclear. Question if you’re really saying “ Objectivity - Boo!”
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add AN1 (ASX) to my watchlist
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.