Ian,
Ya forgot about that ANZ Nom holding on the Major Shareholders list! No 3 with just under 5m. So we could see a tad more selling then. But I don't harbour the concern re a cheap takeover and to be honest, when I saw the GIR deal with AMCI last week, I felt increased confidence that management are working in maximising impact for shareholders, this is their style.
What I particularly like is that 49% of co/- presently held by substantial holders. Thought struck me last night, with GIR all cashed up from the AMCI and RHI deal, we can only hope that they will be positioned to pick up these little crumbs - certainly with the JV interests with PMH, would be in their interests? Yesterdays trading definately looked like someone was poised to pick them up.
Half a percent huh... at this rate half expecting to see your name on that list, especially if current holders use this as an opportunity to increase holdings - after all, don't see that the exposure is a massive risk with the resuts we have seen coming through on Ann Mason alone! Good for you! Cheers, DL
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- PMH
- pmh is cheap compare with its peers
pmh is cheap compare with its peers, page-16
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 25 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
TLX
Telix jumps 11.6% as US government indicates proposed medicare changes won't affect prostate cancer drug
RNU
Renascor wins a funding boost given it wants to produce a critical mineral – but $5M award pales in comparison to some