It just lacks logic. How could they not be the same ‘at worst’ it is impossible for the alternative. Either ACA mucked up a simple test and subsequent results, or the tester applied more liberally using just her finger. The results presented are clearly not feasible.
Be interested to hear thoughts from P&G on this story, after all, they have scientifically validated it.
A Current Affair tonight, page-59
Add WFL (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.478M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
| WFL (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable