Hi wotsup
Up to your little tricks and cherry picking again? There is not one verse that you have put up that the the starting point of "send"is after Jesus' baptism.
Simple clarity --> John 17:18 - As thou hast sent me into the world, even so have I also sent them into the world
So come on smarty, did Jesus send them out as babies etc as per your references following = NO!
Completely irrelevant conclusion. God send is only begotten son. He had to be born first.
Jesus as was promised to Moses Deu 18:18 was raised, led and taught by His God and Father, from childhood and then at around the age of 30, was SENT out into the world
Exactly. So he didn't start at baptism.
Clearly Jesus knew this before Baptism = so this means absolutely zero with regards to when Jesus was "officially" sent out into the world.
Now you are hedging your bets. Now you are adding "officially". A bit of logic would tell you that he can't be send anywhere if he wasn't firstly sent or born.
I came out from, came forth from, down from heaven God AND sent into the world.
A 5 year old person would tell you that is the beginning, when he was born not 30 years later.
The Word "of" God = represents, means, the role he played, to carry the Almighty God and Fathers words of eternal life into the world, the Titus plan, fulfillment.
Again you show your total ignorance of what the bible says. Titus is not God, therefore it cannot be his plan. In fact it is not Titus speaking at all, It is Paul. And Paul is many things, but not God.
And you again do not finish the sentence. ... and which now at his appointed season he has brought to light through the preaching entrusted to me by the command of God our saviour.
Again a clear reference that Paul regards Jesus to be God.
Luke 3:22 - And the Holy Ghost descended in a bodily shape like a dove upon him, and a voice came from heaven, which said, Thou art my beloved Son; in thee I am well pleased
And have you any idea what that means? According to you, Jesus comes from Mary not from a fertilized egg but from the Word. Lets do you simultaneous equation. Word = God = Holy spirit.
What is Jesus? Word, God and Holy Spirit. So according to you, The Holy Ghost came down and sat on the Holy Ghost. You have a bit of a problem there don't you?
My Fathers house, and we know the Father is also Jesus's God = Jesus is not the Almighty God and Father.
Luke 1:32 - He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest: and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David:
So now Jesus is not the son of God, or Joseph and Mary he is David's son. And like David he will rule of a pathetic little village in the Middle East? Do you actually read the dribble you believe in?
Reading of the original Greeks etc Pear Bear IS irrelevant, it is simply a decoy of yours, I am drawing upon what the majority claim and from the Same source they have taken their interpretations from, accept in their case, a pre-set mind has had them ADD words which do not belong.
It is not a decoy at all. Are you an ancient greek scholar? Have you seen the originals or not? If the answer to these is no, then you like us are relying on some one else word. We mere mortals accept the bible as is. You who uses the royal "we" need to explain to us if the bible is wrong, from authority you are quoting. Is it Jesus? Is it RM? To prove a point in one of your posts you quoted RM as the expert that the bible was corrupted about 100 years after Jesus.
Pear
Expand