Ann: Change in substantial holding, page-81

So your proposing AGO assets get reconfigured whatever that means (they only have Webber that's feasible).
AGO then invites the neighbours over to be reconfigured also (I am sure they will be receptive to that idea lol)
Then they go to FMG/HPPL cap in hand and suggest to them that AGO and their neighbours want to use your infrastructure because they can make more money? I would assume also FMG/HPPL would have to finance all the infrastructure also. (That will be an easy sell...not)

I would suggest you are not in mining and have never heard of the term "material risk" to your business model.

What absolute up ramping nonsense you propose.