I reread that and what I think they are trying to do is do enough shallow drilling between the two resources and hope they get enough say 0.3% CuEq material (above cut off ) or above to bring in low grade tonnes ( better than waste ) to allow them for resource reporting purposes only first up to do a big pit that will also bring in some of the deeper drilling under existing open cut resources. But for an actual operation and what I mean as a starter pit is that you start much smaller on the high grade areas within the bigger project to get solid operating cash flow before you do a much bigger cut back. Who knows and all will be revealed. I’d like to know who is doing the PEA work as this is mining, not geology. I could be totally wrong here as well and maybe they go for smaller pits before heading underground.
What I am expecting is guidance as to what next before they can justify going to from scoping to PFS or the 43101 equivalent
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- XAM
- Ann: Interim Financial Report - 30 June 2018
Ann: Interim Financial Report - 30 June 2018, page-6
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add XAM (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
5.7¢ |
Change
-0.002(3.39%) |
Mkt cap ! $97.81M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
5.9¢ | 5.9¢ | 5.7¢ | $42.01K | 729.1K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 100000 | 5.6¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
5.7¢ | 47530 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 100000 | 0.056 |
4 | 958326 | 0.055 |
4 | 542363 | 0.054 |
5 | 439301 | 0.053 |
3 | 1061924 | 0.052 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.057 | 47530 | 1 |
0.060 | 820460 | 5 |
0.061 | 360000 | 2 |
0.062 | 245500 | 2 |
0.063 | 25675 | 1 |
Last trade - 15.24pm 12/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
XAM (ASX) Chart |