BRK discussion, page-1006

You want to control the narrative here Bob?

My investment strategy in part is to avoid being left carrying the bag aka baggy. Because you see Bob, if the pros are selling and retail schmucks are buying... this is not a good thing, imo. The old follow the smart money. I was in another MW special. All the usual suspects were in the T20 in the early days. Getting set. Nek minnet... they had all flown the coop.

Here is you discussing how good Merchant are via introducing Intiger to IAM aka the MW special I mentioned. In this case MW sold his free oppies then quit his directorship and continually sold down his holding into announcements. IAM SP has never recovered.

https://hotcopper.com.au/posts/21882557/single

So it is interesting now that you do not want to discuss who is buying/selling and yet, in one of your earlier posts on here you discuss the very same thing:

https://hotcopper.com.au/posts/22663721/single

Key bit:
"Some big bitters getting set at these prices.
NB: I'm not one of them but paid 1.6 yesterday.
Get set for big ride!!!"

Price then... 1.6c. Date: 16/2/17.

So tell me, how exactly is BRK doing a good job at creating demand for new punters? Or do you mean new baggies?

Not to be outdone, your first post on TMT was discussing who is buying/selling.
https://hotcopper.com.au/posts/21486299/single

All your posts, bar one, are on Cicero/MW plays...

PS: None of the other stock codes are a cross-promote; in fact, the opposite is true;
PPS: Each other stock code is relevant due to the link with MW;
PPPS: This post is not an attempt at baiting etc. I am attempting to highlight you do exactly what you are asking me/the thread not to do.