Black or white yes or no, page-3

Also on their first page on the web it states at www.obj.com.au

"Obj is a global leader in magnetically enhanced transdermal molecular delivery technology."  now this next part is the interesting bit "From drugs, analgesics, oral health to beauty and skin care products were driving innovation and constantly creating new and more effective delivery techniques for our commercial partners "

Anyone who reads this would rightly assume that OBJ has COMMERCIAL PARTNERS (Plural)   Yet what is the reality (we know so far ) P & G is one... what or who else... 

It would be nice if our "commercial partners" actually used our tech in drugs , analgesics, oral health etc...  No point constantly creating stuff no-one wants to take up ??  Or have they taken it up and until launch remains highly confidential??? 

The statements that OBJ have said in ASX releases, and what their web site says would lead anyone to believe P & G is not our only partner. The market is pricing OBJ as a 1 trick pony or 1 partner company... If OBJ are so upfront with the plural (partners) why is that we scratch our heads as shareholders trying to join dots as to who we may or are still involved with and have deals done... 

The OBJ statement reads that the "Partners" have requested or wanted OBJ to develop things for  them...   or is OBJ just making things that they ask , then showing the partners, then they walk away every time? Is OBJ being strung along by other huge multi nationals ? We have learnt our lesson with timeframes with P & G..2014 was to be the year  ...4 years on we are way behind where we started... 

OBJ's statement to me appears far more concrete than wishy washy "potential" deals..  We just need a bit more accurate disclosure , and that could ignite a rocket under the share price.