you chaps (Davo n Well CashedUp) are right on top of it. Well if you are correct, Mr Wellington shoe/choo liked TAM at higher levels 13/14c, then he must Luv em here sub 10c. If it is just shuffling of custodians then thats perhaps why they never lodged a change in substantial shareholder notice? because maybe?? the beneficial owner never changed, but agree, it should have disclosure so that the market actually knows whats going on.
Mr WellingtonChoo, where, prey tell, are Ewe.
change in substantial holding..., page-12
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 24 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
