They can if they can provide evidence that it's impacted the company financially. They most certainly can. If her comments released after they've produced Syngas has resulted a sell off in SP. After positive news - it would be hard to defend that it's not a direct correlation.
She and her coven could be sued for defamation, financial loss, damages and obstruction. IMO
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- NRZ
- Constitutional Lawyer help me please?
Constitutional Lawyer help me please?, page-6
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 21 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add NRZ (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.4¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $8.724M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
LGP
Record revenue of $10.2 million as European demand drives 40% quarterly growth, with $1 million in operating cash inflow and $0.5 million in cost savings forecast
NRZ (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable