re: ts, negotiations and pricing Hi Mick,
There are a few numbers bandied about, the closest is shown here:
Date of LUM Announcement: 24 Oct 2003:
Extract:
"Moreover, the signs will gain unrivalled exposure from
the ubiquitous presence of Times Square and New York
skyline throughout world media: film, television,
newscasts, postcards, art, sport, entertainment, New
Year’s Eve coverage, etc.
Location:
4 Times Square: The 48-story Conde Nast Building
at the ‘Crossroads of the World’ – Broadway and
42nd Street.
_______________________________________
Energy consumption kwh/m2:
LED sign leader: 12
LUMA Panel: 0.6
______________________________
Co2 emissions per 80 m2 (t):
LED sign leader: 390
Luma Panel: 20
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
So, as far as power is concerned, the LED leader uses 20 times as much as LUM's screen does.
The 90% *less* is often used in articles; it is somewhat better than that.
The CO2 number is also staggering, that of the LED leader is also 20 times greater.
Gerry
Info on LUM:
http://www.hotcopper.com.au/post_thread.asp?fid=1&tid=56268&sym=LUM#141648
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- LUM
- durst 1mil
durst 1mil, page-13
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)