Thinking of investing In QBL?, page-62

Luke your the best here no doubt especially when it comes to not believing in rainbows and your A1 (sincerely) researching.
Yes it's up to the substantial holder to tell COY of their holdings. These numbers were put in the re compliance applications once found out by the secretary, to me that means the COY new beforehand, competent management should've noticed the changes in substantial holdings, right?
Questions were asked after these applications were handed into the ASX, by the ASX, therefore the COY was well aware that the #1 shareholder had sold over 200 million shares before even handing in re compliance papers. A COY normally would've informed holders and the courts about it prior to handing re compliance papers in.
The COY later was asked to fix this through fed courts.
Doesn't really matter who or who isn't the plaintiff at present, plaintiff pretty much means who got to dob on who first.
Out of court, loyalty should be to shareholders, It's about who knew what when and when this public COY let their shareholders know about it.

No B.S. about #1 in the T20.
A lot of suspicion when a very late annual report comes out just after the closing of a CR that would show the biggest shareholder selling about 15% of the shares on issue.
Sure nothing SUSS there Luke.