Share
1,818 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 425
clock Created with Sketch. 28/11/18
23:07
Share
Originally posted by aniesbaswedan
↑
I think the assumption that crabbe21 has made;"...if SAS Nano Sat isn't that good they are only going to lose 10milliom and the first 2 years is only the start." is actually false "Under the terms of the agreement, SAS and GlobalSat have established non-exclusive commercial terms for GlobalSat to distribute,sell, market and promote SAS’ ground-breaking narrow-band connectivity solutions and respective products to its customers, affiliates, resellers, subscribers and end users within Latin America." global sat has no obligation to pay SAS a single cent not a commercial offtake agreement there is absolutely NO potential risk for any loss incurred on the side of global sat at all "....SAS expects to generate revenues of US$5 million within the first 2 years based on the conservative GlobalSat Group estimate....." estimate expects is not guaranteed let alone obligated to be realized by global sat and SAS. To be honest, in my view, the agreement really does not mean much at all. This is especially because as far as I know global sat is merely a reseller of services and equipments. So they do not own the spectrum and the infrastructure needed to provide connections to ground servers or PSTN, etc. In light of that then without commercial agreement with telcos that own them then SAS will have nothing for global sat to distribute, sell, market and promote and that 5 million would end up being nothing but hot air. Actually I think, all in all global sat is never bound nor obligated by this agreement to do anything at all if they don't want to.... this agreement is...very silly... Do correct me on this but where does it say that global sat is obligated to do anything??? Where?Interesting.... "Sales will commence immediately following the launch of the first batch of Pearls and the suc- ."
Expand
Curious. How do SAS test the Pearls when the don't exist yet? Obviously the can't so I'll grant you some hyperbolic license. But seriously, what sort of testing do we expect? The more detail the better so I'm able to track progress.
