Could you read over your previous post on this thread?
...To be honest, I thought the same thing when I read this (my bold and underline)
"All that said, our recruitment initiative and corresponding strength in growth in ALL areas of this business is extraordinary and its clear that the operational environment is supportive of much more of the same well into the future."
Obviously, the 'our' could be referring to HC members interested in PET too, but given that statement, her unbridled enthusiasm for all things PET and her newcomer status, I was interested to see Dianne's response. That said, it was more curiosity and I wouldn't have cared too much if she was more a PR person than an investor...
The allegation I raised about the use of fake accounts on this thread did not originate with me.
I was repeating an assertion that was first raised by two posters back in September. Curiously, one of the posters who first aired the issue was yourself.
It seems fairly bizarre to blast another poster for repeating a suggestion that you yourself raised in an earlier post. And you appear to be completely oblivious to the obvious double-standard.
I also couldn't help but notice that this year your posts on the thread this have largely consisted of attacks on other posters.
Have you considered doing some actual research before you post?. Or, if that sounds like too much work, even just reading over what you wrote the last time to make sure your posts are consistent?. Surely not an unreasonable expectation.
(20min delay)