Ann: 6th Supplementary Prospectus, page-132

@kvz

See how quickly the QBL representative can respond to posts. He must watch this forum very closely.

This, in my view, is a very good example why I recommend not providing one's identity to others. My observations over time is that this forum is monitored very closely by the QBL representative. I have no idea why? It seems wholly impractical to me.

Honestly, I would have thought it better to just get on with the job of getting the company re-listed and let the facts and figures do the talking?

"... the company's willingness to respond to any and all shareholders"

Sheesh ... that's the 'club' I was referring to - shareholders. And the poster confirms it!

Anyway, can you respond to the questions I posed in my previous post?

"He constantly reminds me to remain objective"

I assume, 'he' Neil refers to is me. If so, I don't recall requesting Neil to remain objective - maybe some evidence please. Perhaps I did? In any event, given Neil's 'objectivity' what can you say to the predictions of a 15c SP on re-listing? Does your objectivity also cover unsupported / exaggerated posts that are posted by holders? That would certainly establish your objectivity - to question holders posts as well - would it not? 

Holders, ask yourself,

Why is Neil (the QBL rep) so quick to offer views on anything that resembles a justified, evidenced and purposeful critique?

I would also like to point all posters, including the company representative, to the HC Cyber Bully Policy. It is in everyone's interests to ensure that all posters can post on HotCopper without the , "... fear of being intimidated by any response."

Froggy - what kept me from investing? Have a look back over my posts - should be reasonably clear! 

https://hotcopper.com.au/help/cyber-bully-policy/