An MIK is being applied to 500 holes (?) which implies a lot of samples but it's unclear what the variance of the samples is or why MIK. If there has been subsequent drilling, then the resource should (must?) be re-estimated. The idea of MIK is to deal with a highly variable population. Why does it say in the original report that a 40g/t top cut was applied?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SVG
- Ann: Native Title Agreement Executed for Agate Creek Gold Mine
Ann: Native Title Agreement Executed for Agate Creek Gold Mine, page-65
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 36 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
LU7
Discover the strong preliminary feasibility of the Bécancour Lithium Refinery, showcasing resilience in a low pricing environment and a strategic plan to capitalize on future price recoveries
Add SVG (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
2.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $6.183M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
SVG (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable