Inspections happen all the time and are never reported - what's the big deal?
IMHO, the regulator should deliver a warning then give adequate time for rehab requirements to be implemented, then return for a follow up site visit before taking a decision to suspend or otherwise - factoring in any mitigation.
We live in country with a judiciary that operates on fair principles and due process, not a kangaroo court system.
It stinks the regulator chooses to suspend a couple of days before Xmas - why not issue notice of intent for follow up site visit in NY then re-assess. Surely the regulator will be off for the next two weeks regardless.
Why waste neurons trying to create a hurricane when this is merely a storm in a tea cup?!?
Ann: Trading Halt, page-51
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 104 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add CCZ (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.9¢ |
Change
0.001(12.5%) |
Mkt cap ! $13.08M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.9¢ | 0.9¢ | 0.9¢ | $22.18K | 2.464M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | 5340999 | 0.8¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.9¢ | 2405071 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 01/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| CCZ (ASX) Chart |