Ann: Trading Halt Update, page-65

Seing as we are all haveing a guess about this out come i will have my stab in the dark.

Logic is that if EcT had a yes or no they would not need feed back for any thing what so ever.

To need feedback ECT are confused and need an explaination. Thats a logicle concluson,

And they would only want feed back if some thing apart from a yes or no has hapened. Thats logicle concluson to.

Now the gueswork.

What could have hapened apart from a yes or no is that nothing could have hapened at the board meeting. Like the singing item was not on the agenda which ECT said NMDC told them is confirmed to be on the agenda about 4 anoncments ago. Aparently that was completly tied up and confirmed with NMDC.

What throws me out is that at first in Janruary ECT says NMDC confirmed the singing was to be decided on at this next board meeting. I asumed that was the date for the singing seremoney.

Then a couple of days ago ECT says that the considaration of the RCA  was actualy the thing on the agenda. Thats completly diferrent two things!

It might be that ECT thought one things was on the agenda but it never was and so they are seeking feed back about how or why or what ever was on the agenda or how a miscomunicaton hapened in the first instence.

My guess is that ECT have been put aside at the board meeting and they have nothing to report to share holders and they now want to find out why.