what the, page-4

Quixotic, don't stress mate.. I hope you kept a copy of what you wrote.. it was food for thought. Somewhere a raw nerve was hit... the lack of a challenging response seems to suggest you were too close to the truth IMO. The fact that you make an effort to stop other people losing there $ in similar companies is to be rigorously applauded.

Takes alot of backbone. A large portion of HC postings could be easily be reported to ASIC for their baseless ramping. Take a screen shot of this whole GSF thread before it gets deleted.. the outrageous claims have done damage to many investors here should be entitled to scrutiny well before yourself.

Apart from taking the bold step to single out certain names, i don't think you did anything wrong, you just pointed out a seemingly consistent pattern that seems to lead to destruction for investors. I don't believe you are being defamatory anymore than the little boy that pointed out the emperor was wearing no clothes. Wasn't the little boys fault for noticing the glaring obvious... the emperor shouldn't have given him something to talk about.

Just becareful about painting everyone with the same brush.. even in a dodgy company, there can still be some people in management that might have really intended to do the right thing.

Do you have doubts that the Londo deal really fell apart at the last minute ? Cos if that was all genuine, the GSF SP can't be really be blamed on management. BUt I am a little surprised that since it was supposed the stock was progressing towards completing the deal, that the SP should have been climbing steadily ( despite the weak market).. cos the completed deal was worth a lot on paper.