Gral
That is not a particular logical arguement there. The tender for the port is unrelated to the case and is done through a jointly MMX/Mitsubishi owned vehicle.
Banks given size of partner will always put up money. However Mitsubishi still hasnt finished paying for its 50% share of IO assets and that is where I assume MMX was going to get there contribution to infrastructure.
Even though you say the case is a dud still cant see Mitsubishi handing over any more money until case is resolved or else it will go into a trust pending an outcome.
Would you care to elaborate on why the case is a dud or is that just wishful thinking.
cant stay away, page-5
Add CHM (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.6¢ |
Change
-0.001(3.03%) |
Mkt cap ! $14.18M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.6¢ | 1.7¢ | 1.6¢ | $10.84K | 677.2K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | 1997996 | 1.6¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.7¢ | 245189 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 23/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| CHM (ASX) Chart |