Who decides what is art and what is porn? Who decides what "artistic license" should be given to whom? Who decides who may be called an artist? Upon whom falls the responsibility of protecting fragile values like "innocence" and "childhood"? The phrase "Contemporary Art" is not be allowed to disintegrate into an excuse to insult and offend a society.
Where is the line that separates "art" from "pornography?" Or do people think there ought not to be one? Would it not then, the removal of that line debase the merit of all art, of all creative values? Artists, poets, writers, actors. Surely there has to be a line that separates these two:art from porn. Good act from bad.
