"Imo, and with respect to your profession, your inflexibility in adhering to your line of questioning is beginning to appear to be matched only by the inflexibility of the most rabbid conpiratory theorists. Even to the point of ridiculing those that hold those suspicions."
WTF?? Your taking the micky aren't you?? There is a debate here right? I dispel the "myths" these guys come up with, with facts and physical law. I get no answers from questions and you reckon I'm inflexible???
"No-one is denying that the kinetic energy of a falling body increases the further it falls, and becomes a greater force on impact ... even us non engineers accept that."
Yeah there is actually. Warnie and Dlux. Read there posts.
"The question is 'why did the object begin to fall in the first place?' And I have already emphasised to you that any investigation that begins with a conclusion and then looks for a hypothesis to support that conclusion, as the NIST investigations have, are significantly flawed and not credible."
Thats your question mate from way back. Its been addressed numerous times and the debate has moved onto other stuff. How arrogant!
"as the NIST investigations have, are significantly flawed and not credible."
I'm from that industry. I know its credible because I'm trained and experienced in the field. Who are YOU to say such a thing when you can't even identify a oxy cut when you see one? A fresh oxy cut with no dust on it mind you. No dust after 500 000tons of concrete/steel just fell down around it???
"Having read this article below, any reasonable person would accept that there is definitely sufficient reason to be suspicious of the 'official' version of the collapse of the WTC 1&2, and more than sufficient for the collapse of WTC 7."
- No. Any reasonable person would understand the logistics to pull of a job successfully like that would be impossible. - They, even with basic mechanical knowledge would understand it would be impossible to pack a building with explosives without 50 000 office workers noticing. - They would also understand that HARD evidence would have surfaced by now. - They would understand that the people that would be needed to be involved in a operation of that magnitude would be heavy to say the least, and human nature pretty much means there will be "blabbers", but not one has surfaced. - They would understand that why would the government commit to such a complex operation with 100% probability of getting caught out, as opposed to say doing something far less complex like exploding a couple of mini nukes in trucks in down town Manhattan which would have the same shock effect required to be used as catalyst for sinister political objectives. - They would understand that video evidence of Bin Laden admitting to it and gloating that they were delightfully surprised when the buildings come down because they didn't expect that to happen pretty much indicates Al Qaeda are behind it.
Thank god most people are reasonable as opposed to the small number of gullible types!
