Witch some one else brought up a similar foolish arguement
The picture you are referring to was a news item, a picture of an actual event that portrayed the horrors of war.
The girl was not stripped naked to increase the effect of the photo and although the photo has become acclaimed for the image it portrayed, the image being the horrors of war that jsut happened to contain a naked girl no one apart from a very sick individual would get enjoyment from looking at the photo.
Would you hang a large copy of the picture on your lounge room wall?
No look at the context of what this so called artist has down
Taken pictures of young girls, girls who were naked for no other purpose than to increase the effect of the picture, in what could be described as sexaully suggestive poses albiet mild. for no other purpose than to pleasure and enjoyment of a very small number of adults.
