agm what to do., page-7

Reganba...

The past RSM (read) office manager bless her heart - told me ages ago that she rarely checks the email address info at compass ....that was after I rang up a few weeks after not recieving an answer to an email.

She gave me her direct email address and was wonderful thereafter hunting people down and ensuring I got an answer to my Q - If they were too busy to formulate a reply she would reply for them. At least she did that until I started asking some more difficult Q's and pushing home certain points (mainly in support of Westy's numerous Q's at AGM's and other matters) - Think I gained some notoriety and ended up black listed or at least put on a two week followup flag - went from a cpl of day turnaround to a two week turn around response to my emails - but ya get that.

She left about 2 -3 months ago I was told at the AGM. My last email from her was back in Feb so maybe that answers why my two week turn around became a two month turnaround lol - but unless she changed her ways it may be that anything sent to the info address prior to the new CFO taking control of the address was not read.

If you have sent anything in say the last month or two and it hasnt been answered I suggest you ring the new CFO and ask why.

His name is Neil and the switch number is (02) 94173588. If it was before the last month or two then there is a fair chance it was never read.

(Communicating by written word such as on a chat site or email does leaves ones comments open to misinterpretation so appologies if I misinterpret) but to the comment you dont care if the new board is arrogant or not - as long as they deliver - well I do care - the simple reason being that they don;t have the runs on the board yet to justify the apparent arrogance

Moreover, if shareholders dont care if they are arrogant then they can't expect their emails to be answered - an arrogant board is not a board who sees shareholder concerns as relevant or worth the time to answer. Nor can they expect the board to see the importance of having an open line of communication between them and shareholders. So maybe it is worth revisiting how much you care and expressing that in any follow up emails Again - if I have misinterpreted your comment - I am sorry and will willingly conceed.

I would see such an open line of communication falling loosly within the improved PR issue - public relations which to me covers the investor relations needs because if the right message is effectivvely communicated to the public you are relating to - some of them will very likely also become investors so it kills two birds with one stone -

Only thing in that issue I am against is the idea of having an exclusive investor relations officer - an email from PC a while back rejected the need for better PR but indicated that investor relations was the direction the board intended moving towards. I dont like that idea because it sounds too much like appointing someone to handle investors - sorta like we saw attempted at the AGM

Moroever, I firmly believe and said the same some time ago that we should have a good PR mob on board now so they can get to know us and we them because once we embark on a project that will see uranium produced - even as a byproduct - you can bet ya goolies that the anti U brigade with be out in force against us and I reckon they will have their PR machines primed and ready to pounce so we will be far better served if we have a good PR firm who has some history with us and demonstrated ability onside and on board well before that fracas develops -

God I just realised instead of referring to the company I am using the terms us and we - does that mean I am a long term holder again lol God help me - betta not tell the wife

Anyway - if anyone agrees on the PR side can I suggest you make your opinions clear to the board - we have had more than enough people stand up to counter what westy has said at past meetings and other efforts to passify the board in an effort to smooth the ruffeld feathers and all they did was forestall the inevitable confrontation - and from where I sat that is exactly what it was - a confrontation.

Dont worry about them feeling upset by your comments - plenty have gone before you. Worst they do is put you on a two week turnaround for ya emails and maybe bag you in private - but if you are right in what you say who cares