Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Lying Liberals - fact, page-20

First 20 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
dan1

19,312 Posts.

30

06/03/19

12:22

Post #: 37670133
Share

Originally posted by Glug: ↑

If you need tax payers to subsidize your property investing to make it worthwhile, then there is something majorly wrong with the system.

Maybe to level the playing field, first home buyers should be allowed to negatively gear their first home, as it makes as much sense as any other negative gearing on established properties.

Hard to save sufficient when you are chasing a market where prices are increasing around $1,000 per week, and income growth is slow. Some can do it, others miss out to investors subsidized by tax payers.

So do you actually support the idea of us tax payers subsidizing investor losses on established homes through negative gearing?

Expand

the tax benefit is part of the ability for rental properties to be affordable as it effectively becomes a part of the investors yield.

Take that away and rents go up.
2 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

LIS

Li-S Energy the latest microcap to pivot to US defence market

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 018 – Potatoes, TACOs, and the $120M helicopter heist

LDX

Lumos Diagnostics surges 140% on major US contract deal

ASX Market Close: Why are we red today? Because US CPI's at 3%

LU7

Lithium Universe targets silver boom with breakthrough solar recycling tech

First 20 Last

SPONSORED BY