Share
3,411 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 417
clock Created with Sketch.
09/03/19
12:48
Share
Originally posted by tutor
↑
I can help with this using Blackrock as an example. The World Mining Fund has owned GXY for a while and so it lends out its stock in order to increase returns on its portfolio. Its custodian (one of the custody banks like JPM) administers the lending program. A borrower (usually another bank) asks JPM for availability and quote a borrow fee. The request is typically driven by a customer that wants to short GXY. For example, a hedge fund that uses (say) MS as its prime broker. MS borrows the stock on behalf of its HF customer from JPM. The HF then sells the stock on market. At some point, the HF covers by buying on market and MS can return the stock to JPM or continue to pay the fee to hold the stock in inventory so that another HF customer can borrow without having to go to the effort of sourcing the stock again. In the short reporting stats, lending between JPM and MS would count as gross lending, but not net.
It probably doesn't completely answer things for you, but I hope it gives you the sense that there are more moving parts to this than just Blackrock lending shares to a HF. It also demonstrates that you can have two loans, but just one short trade... MS in the example was a borrower and lender. Any comments questions welcome.
Expand
Share Trail –
HF – Sells to the market, (bringing share price down)
HF – Buys from the market, (To retrieve the shares)
MS May - store or distribute the shares, by returning the shares to HF?
MS May – return shares to JPM?
So, in this scenario, HF can still sustain the shorting activity, by re-retrieving shares from MS, who may still have shares in storage?
However, this exercise appears to have a finite ending when HF runs out of shares to sell and/or MS runs out of shares in storage?
Does this look correct, or can HF still continue shorting by approaching another supplier, other than MS?