Scientists and ...!, page-1575

''Anyway, I leave you to enjoy your unsubstantiated love of Hadiths which are the source of the hatred you show towards the Point of Adoration of 1.8 million Muslims.''

This has nothing to do with hatred (this has been explained before), that is your means of defense, making false accusations and claims against your discussion opponents. We are just pointing out recorded history and available information without favour.

Sure, information that varies in reliability, that is understood and allowed for.

You, on the other hand, just reject anything and everything that does not conform to your own faith on that basis....it does not fit Kam's beliefs, must be false.

Try to apply a bit of healthy skepticism when it comes to faith, Kam.

Logic must tell you that if - for example - Christians believe something that Muslims don't, one side must be wrong. Or both sides could be wrong. Both sides cannot be right.

So what exactly is true? Who or what is being 'adored' or 'worshiped' and why?