look carefully at the results can someone tell me why they're quoting figures at 1m intervals for the same sample? For example you have one drill sample MNRC0012 where there quoting 64-65m at 55.8% 65-66m at 54.3% 66-67m at 53.8% 67-68m at 55.6% etc etc Why not just quote 64-68m at 54.9%? It just seems they're making it look better than it is by quoting in 1m intervals as if they're padding the results to suggest they got more high grade samples than they really have. Looks dodgy to me but maybe a geo can put me straight?
MXR Price at posting:
0.0¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
