Waislitz on MSB, page-12

@johnnym2

Re "sorry that was indeed an unclear sentence, and my post in general wasn’t very well expressed."

I sense you might be falling in to the trap of trying to appease the unappeasable.

Your original post was perfectly logical. In my opinion the endless babble about shorting is a distraction. An individual that shorts any stock is usually taking much more risk than other types of investors. The pressure exerted on a stock is almost always on the upside, it suits the narrative of many companies to blame a hidden shorting agenda to disguise their own inability to provide a clear message that would persuade an investor.

As sure as you can be, the shorter will, at some point, have to exert at least the same buying pressure when they inevitably buy out of their short position as there was downward pressure applied by the initial transaction. This simple fact is just routinely ignored. Instead we are asked to believe that wave after wave of accumulators have been plucking up this stock these past 10 years and, singlehandedly, dragged the sp down without the company ever making even one false move.

Of course, it is up to you how you post, but I wouldn't feel compelled to appease someone who, themselves, never points to specific examples to support any of their own crazy theories and never once retracts or revisits their own long history of misinformation.